May 12, 2009

Articles on Writing for May!

Filed under: Articles, Useful links, Publishers, Print on Demand — hannah @ 11:39 pm

 Over the next few weeks I will be publishing a series of articles on this blog.  After which I shall upload them all onto my website. My aim with the website is to offer as much useful content as possible to writers of all levels at any stage.So, with this idea in mind I had two options.  Write all the articles myself OR get help!  Obviously, I chose the latter option.  A) I don’t know it all!  and B) I’m lazy. So, I turned to my trusted bank of authonomy buddies and all of them were more than happy to help out.  In truth, I was delighted at how supportive they were.  They really are a great bunch of helpful AND talented writers. Thank you for helping me.  *inserts smiley face*I hope you find all the articles both interesting and useful.  They cover everything from the future of publishing to how to write erotica.I know which one I’ll be salivating over….Please enjoy and feel free to make any comments either to me, or to the author.  All the contributor’s web details will be available so if you like what you read - go check them out some more!  And if you want to contribute an article to my blog and my website, please drop me a line. Thanks. 

January 26, 2009

If It Can Happen For Me - It can Happen For Everyone!

Filed under: Publishers, Uncategorized — hannah @ 5:33 pm

Last week, Authonomy broke the news that they had given book deals to three authors from the site.  One of these, Miranda Dickinson, gives the following message of hope:

"Hey lovely Authonomists

I’d just like to say a humungous thank you to everyone who has sent messages and been so thoroughly fab about Coffee At Kowalski’s being published - it means the most coming from such a hugely talented bunch of writers as yourselves in this community that I love being a part of.

The main thing about my news is that it proves that Authonomy works. What’s more, it proves that just being up on the site can be enough because people are looking - the highest Kowalski’s ever reached in the rankings was around 70th - and I was really chuffed to have made the top 100! Just keep plugging and keep visible - because you honestly never know who is searching the site for new writers…

I am honestly still in complete shock about being published - it still doesn’t feel real even though the hard work getting my book ready to hit the shelves at the end of the year has already begun.

Just keep believing, keep writing and keep having fun on Authonomy - because, seriously, if it can happen for me it can happen for anyone!!"

Her book, Coffee at Kowalski’s can be read here:

http://www.authonomy.com/ViewBook.aspx?bookid=2540

January 19, 2009

What do Publishers Know?

Filed under: Rejections, Publishers — hannah @ 10:49 am

After posting my Rejection Letters thread on the authonomy forum, Larry made this comment.  So good thought I’d cut and paste it here:

Publisher’s readers have a poor record for predicting best sellers. They reject future stars, like J.K. Rowling, if they’re outside the mainstream. They get enthusiastic over some books, which receive massive marketing budgets, and then disappear without trace. Private Eye (an English satirical magazine) used to publish an annual list of books which had attracted tremendous advances, alongside their derisory sales figures. The reality is that popularity can’t be predicted by applying simple rules - ‘celebrity memoirs, that’s what the public want’.

Roberto Bolano, currently being hailed as one of the greatest novelists of the millennium, ignored plot and incorporated long digressions, and was largely unread in the UK and US when he died, five years ago. Now he’s a publishing sensation, and has gone from having one book in translation, in a small press, to being a major success for Picador. Poor reviews and a pile of rejection slips? You could be a mega-star within five years like Bolano. Keep the focus on excellence, and ignore advice on what the market is looking for!

November 10, 2008

NUMBER ONE!!!!

I have been hanging out on authonomy so much that I neglected my poor little blog.  So after a few nudges from my new *friends* I feel compelled to update.So the good news?Somehow I managed to make it to the top of the pile! The Voices of Angels (new draft) is currently number one on the authonomy website. Wow.Authonomy is the new Harper Collins website for writers looking to be published.  The online equivalent of the slush pile.  You need to upload a min of 10,000 words.  The site works great as an online writing circle, with lots of useful feedback from fellow writers.Anyway, after uploading the new version (and I still remember how nervous I felt) I’ve received a tonne of feedback, edited it a few times, and swung my way to the top!  Only 3 more weeks to go until the end of the month.  If I can hang on in there, then I’ve made it to the ed’s desk. Whilst making it to the ed’s desk is no guarantee of getting a deal (the most I can hope for right now is that they want to read the rest - better get writing), it does attract a certain amount of kudos.And it’s really boosted my confidence.  I made the number one spot last night and felt ecstatic. So if you want to read the current authonomy numero uno.  Click here! http://www.authonomy.com/ViewBook.aspx?bookid=831

August 12, 2008

What really happens when my Manuscript arrives at the publisher’s/agent’s office?’

Filed under: Critique Service, Publishers — hannah @ 10:04 pm


What really happens when my Manuscript arrives at the publisher’s/agent’s office?

Does it sit in a large pile or is it sorted out in to yes, maybe and no piles.
Then what happens next i.e Who reads it?
Please let me know why it takes so long… It can’t be just the number of manuscripts that drop through the post, can it?
I would really like to know…

(This is a letter and its subsequent reply taken from The Writer’s Market UK website).  I thought it interesting because it gives you an insight in the type of job I used to do! 

——————————————————————————-

Thank you for your query. Unless you send your manuscript to a specific person it will be delivered to whoever handles unsolicited proposals. (That was me!) This could be anyone from a secretary or junior editor, to a commissioning editor or publishing coordinator.  (Or if it’s an agency, maybe the girl/boy on reception.)
This person will then sort the proposals by categories, such as craft, art, history, etc (or genres in the case of large fiction publishers) and distribute them to whoever is the editorial head of that category - usually a commissioning editor.
The editor for each category will then have a look at each of the proposals and, basically, sort them into yes, no and maybe piles.
The ‘maybe’ proposals will then be researched by the editor to determine if they will be able to fit into the companies publishing programme.
Then any ‘yes’ proposals (including ‘maybes’ that look like they will work) will be accepted and the authors will be contacted (usually for more information/pages) and any ‘no’ proposals will be rejected and returned.
Manuscripts are generally read by relevant commissioning editors or, possibly, by the publisher or head of publishing. They aren’t generally read by junior staff at this stage.

For agencies, manuscripts will be read by whichever Agent handles that particular category, so it’s much the same as in a publishing house.  (I used to work in a literary agency and what happened was  the script came in and the assistant to the agent would read it first, and IF it was any good, they would pass it on.  But in most cases, this was not the case, and so the assistant was also responsible for penning the dreaded ‘no’ letter.  I was this assistant and I always tried to make my ‘no’ letters as nice as possible.  This was a film agency but same kind of principal.)
Now, this process can obviously take quite a long time, especially considering the amount or proposals that a publisher receives. This might seem like a silly excuse but some of the larger publishers can receive upwards of 1,000 proposals/manuscripts per year, and smaller publishers usually receive at least 100 or so. If you think of how long it takes just to read one novel at home you should have some idea of how monstrous a task it is to deal with manuscript submissions. This is basically why authors are asked to only submit three chapters in their initial proposals.
Further to this the vast majority of unsolicited manuscripts sent to publishers are unsuitable. They will either be mis-directed, a fiction proposal sent to a non-fiction publisher for example (which happens very often), or they will not adhere to the submission guidelines, or they might just be unlucky to have been submitted at a time when the market is full and there is no more room on the publishers list.
And of course a lot of unsolicited submissions are simply not of an acceptable quality.
All these factors add up to make it very hard and time-consuming to sort through proposals, which is partly why the process takes so long.

opyright © Streamwriting - globalwarming awareness2007